Academic Phrases for composing Results & Discussion chapters of A research Paper

Academic Phrases for composing Results & Discussion chapters of A research Paper

The outcomes and conversation parts are one of many sections that are challenging write. You should prepare this area very very carefully as it can include a great deal of clinical information which should be presented in an obvious and fashion that is concise. The goal of a outcomes part is always to provide one of the keys outcomes of your quest. Outcomes and conversations can be combined into either one part or arranged as split parts with regards to the needs associated with log to that you are publishing your quest paper. Utilize subsections and subheadings to boost clarity and readability. Quantity all tables and numbers with descriptive games.

The outcome and discussion portion of pursuit paper ought to include the annotated following:

  • Findings
  • Contrast with previous studies
  • Limits of one’s work
  • Casual arguments
  • Speculations
  • Deductive arguments

Academic Phrases, Sentences & Vocabulary

1. Findings:
Through the quick review above, key findings emerge: __
We describe the results of __, which show __
This suggests that __
We revealed that __
Our findings on __ at least hint that __
This is an essential choosing within the knowledge of the __
The present research confirmed the findings about __
Another promising finding had been that __
Our results demonstrated that __
This result shows that small is famous concerning the __
A further novel choosing is that __
Together, the current findings confirm __
The implications of those findings are discussed in __
The outcomes indicate a couple of things. First, __. Second, __
The results of this test discovered support that is clear the __
This analysis discovered evidence for __
Planned comparisons revealed that __
Our results casts a brand new light on __
This part summarises the findings and contributions made.
It does well, providing accomplishment.
Thus giving obviously greater results than __
The results concur that this a choice that is good __
From the outcomes, it’s clear that __
In this area, pay someone to write my essay we are going to illustrate some experimental outcomes.
This provides notably greater outcomes due to __
the effect now provides proof to __
It contributes to results that are good even though the enhancement is minimal.
This yields results that are increasingly good information.
The consequence of this analysis will be weighed against the __
The applicability among these results that are new then tested on __
This is important to properly interpret the outcomes.
The outcomes are considerably much better than __
The results result in comparable conclusion where __
Superior results are seen for __
From these outcomes it really is clear that __
Substantial results carried down show that this technique improves __
We get great results with this particular method that is simple.
Nonetheless, better yet answers are accomplished when making use of our algorithm.
It really is well well worth speaking about these interesting facts unveiled because of the link between __
Overall, our method had been one that obtained probably the most results that are robust.
Somewhat results that are superior accomplished with your algorithm.
The effect is equivalent to or much better than result this is certainly presently accepted.

2. Comparison with prior studies: the total outcomes demonstrated in this chapter match state of this art practices.
right right Here we compare the outcome of this proposed technique with those of this methods that are traditional.
These outcomes rise above past reports, showing that __
In line with past studies __
This result ties well with past studies wherein __
Contrary to the findings of __ we didn’t find _though we did not replicate the previously reported __, our results suggest that __
A similar conclusion was reached by __
However, when comparing our results to those of older studies, it must be pointed out __
This is consistent with what has been found in previous __
A similar pattern of results was obtained in __
The findings are directly in line with previous findings
These basic findings are consistent with research showing that __
Other results were broadly in line with __ they have demonstrated that __
Others have shown that __ improves __
By comparing the results from __, we hope to determine __
However, in line with the ideas of __, it can be concluded that __
When comparing our results to those of older studies, it must be pointed out that __
We have verified that using __ produces similar results
Overall these findings are in accordance with findings reported by __

3. Restrictions of one’s work:
due to the absence of __ we made a decision to maybe perhaps not investigate __
One concern concerning the findings of __ ended up being that __
Because of this limitation that is potential we treat __
The restrictions for the current studies naturally include __
Regarding the limits of __, it may be argued that __
Another limitation with this __
This limitation is obvious in many __
Another limitation in __ involves the issue of __
The primary limitation could be the absence of __
One limitation can be found in this situation.
One limitation of the techniques but is that they __
It presents some limits such as __
Although commonly accepted, it is affected with some restrictions due to __
An apparent limitation regarding the technique is __
There are a few limitations for this approach.
One limitation of our execution is it’s __
an important supply of limitation is born to __
The approach utilised suffers through the limitation that __
The limits are becoming clear __
It is affected with the exact same limitations connected with a __

4. Casual arguments:
a well known explanation of __ is the fact that __
It is through now generally speaking accepted that __
A popular explanation is the fact that __
because it’s maybe perhaps maybe not generally speaking agreed that __
These have become tiny and hard to observe.
You will need to emphasize the actual fact that __
It really is notable that __
an question that is important with __ is __
This did not impair the __
This is really important since there is __
This implies that __ is connected with __
This is indicative for lack of __
This will never be biased by __
there have been also some crucial variations in __
It really is interesting to notice that, __
It is not likely that __
This may change or enhance areas of __
In contrast, this will make it possible to __
This is specially essential whenever investigating __
This has been utilized to effectively account fully for __
This presents a potential confound in __
This was included to validate that __

5. Speculations:
nonetheless, we acknowledge there are considerable talks among scientists as to __
We speculate that this could be due to __
There are reasons to doubt this description of __
It remains ambiguous to which degree _that is attributed to __
nevertheless, __ does appear to improve __
This does appear to depend on __
It is very important to notice, that the current evidence relies on __
the outcomes show that __ doesn’t appear to influence the __
but, the level to which you are able to __ is unknown
Alternatively, it may just mean that __
It is hard to spell out such outcomes in the context of __
it really is confusing whether this is certainly the right for __
This seems to be a instance of __
From this point of view, __ can be considered as __
To date, __remain unknown
Under particular presumptions, this is construed as __
Because of the possible limitation, we treat __
In addition, a few questions stay unanswered.
At this time of understanding, we believe__
Therefore, it stays unclear whether __
This may explain why __

6. Deductive Arguments:
a significant difference between these __ can only be due to __
Nonetheless, we genuinely believe that it really is well justified to __
This may raise concerns about __ which is often addressed by __
As discussed, this will be because of the fact that __
outcomes prove that this isn’t fundamentally true.
These findings offer the notion that __ is maybe not impacted by __
This will be the good reason why we failed to find __
In order to try whether this is certainly equivalent across __, we __
Therefore, __ can be viewed as to be comparable for __